Polling
Suggest an important issue not listed in this sub-category (). (Maximum 60 Characters)
Wetlands mitigation banking
In response to the continuing loss of our wetlands resource, in 1988, our government established a “no net loss” (NNL) policy which requires developers to replace wetland areas destroyed by their construction projects. The Corps of Engineers grants permits to fill wetland areas for applicants who wish to develop them. However, before a project is approved, developers must convince regulators they have done all they could to avoid filling-in or damaging wetland areas. They also must submit a plan to either restore former degraded wetland areas or create new ones. To help developers reduce construction delays, mitigation banking was created. Mitigation banking allows credits from the creation of new wetlands in one area to be sold to developers who want to fill-in natural wetlands in another area. Mitigation banks broker the transaction of these wetland mitigation credits.
However, many say these banks have not delivered the results which were required under the “no net loss” policy. Naturalists and environmentalists claim efforts to create new wetlands in unnatural areas most often do not succeed. They say developers sometimes mitigate unrealistic areas merely to sell credits to others intent on destroying natural wetlands. Often, these new areas do not support life or perform the functions of natural wetlands. They claim wetlands mitigation allows natural wetlands to be replaced by these newly created but useless areas, and say mitigation banking exacerbates this problem. Banking critics say developers who purchase ecologically-worthless credits - rather than preserve natural wetland areas - violate the No Net Loss policy and are greatly speeding the disappearance of this precious resource.
Proposed Legislation: Introduction of legislation to prohibit the U.S. Corps of Engineers from granting permits to fill or damage wetland areas until wetland restoration or replacement projects have been proven to provide the functions and benefits of natural wetland areas.
Prospective Sponsor: Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (OR)
However, many say these banks have not delivered the results which were required under the “no net loss” policy. Naturalists and environmentalists claim efforts to create new wetlands in unnatural areas most often do not succeed. They say developers sometimes mitigate unrealistic areas merely to sell credits to others intent on destroying natural wetlands. Often, these new areas do not support life or perform the functions of natural wetlands. They claim wetlands mitigation allows natural wetlands to be replaced by these newly created but useless areas, and say mitigation banking exacerbates this problem. Banking critics say developers who purchase ecologically-worthless credits - rather than preserve natural wetland areas - violate the No Net Loss policy and are greatly speeding the disappearance of this precious resource.
Proposed Legislation: Introduction of legislation to prohibit the U.S. Corps of Engineers from granting permits to fill or damage wetland areas until wetland restoration or replacement projects have been proven to provide the functions and benefits of natural wetland areas.
Prospective Sponsor: Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (OR)
Poll Opening Date
November 11, 2024
Poll Closing Date
November 17, 2024
Democracy Rules respects the privacy of your information.
See PRIVACY STATEMENT
See PRIVACY STATEMENT