Trustee Elections
These are the original issues in this subcategory
- RECIDIVISM
- INMATE HEALTH
- PRISON PRIVATIZATION
Our criminal justice system now detains about 2.3 million people in state, local, federal, juvenile and immigrant detention facilities, among others. Privately-run for-profit prisons were created in 1984. By 2017, this $4.8 billion/year industry was detaining 8.2%, or 121,420 of all US inmates. In 2013, private prison industry profits totaled about $630 million. The annual salaries of guards at private prisons is about $32,000 while our 800,000 federal prison guards average about $78,000. A 2016 Justice Dept. study found private prisons had a 28% higher rate of inmate-on-inmate assaults and more than twice as many inmate-on-staff assaults compared to federal prisons. Other studies in 2010 and 2011 found that it costs more to hold prisoners in private facilities than public ones.
Supporters claim privatized prisons are cheaper and more efficient than prisons operated by our government. They claim these jails can be built quickly, are equipped with the latest technology, are less crowded, and provide jobs for local communities.
Opponents believe that allowing the profit motive into the prison equation does not save money - it only encourages these companies to provide low-paying dangerous jobs and few, if any, economic benefits to local communities. Private prisons are expensive for inmates too, with families paying up to $24.95 for a 15-minute phone call and commissary vendors that bring in $1.6 billion a year. Critics say privatizing prisons has given these corporations and their unions an incentive to lobby against reducing prison populations, saying this industry is often the loudest voice for increased incarceration and longer prison terms.
In a recent executive order, President Biden has decided not to renew Justice Department contracts with private prisons, except for those facilities which detain undocumented immigrants. This action will end the use of private prisons when these contracts expire unless a future president rescinds Biden’s order, or until a law is passed making this change permanent.
Pending Legislation: H.R.994 – Justice is not for sale act 0f 2021
Sponsor: Rep. Raul Grijalva (AZ)
Status: House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security (Judiciary)
Chair: Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (TX)
Supporters claim privatized prisons are cheaper and more efficient than prisons operated by our government. They claim these jails can be built quickly, are equipped with the latest technology, are less crowded, and provide jobs for local communities.
Opponents believe that allowing the profit motive into the prison equation does not save money - it only encourages these companies to provide low-paying dangerous jobs and few, if any, economic benefits to local communities. Private prisons are expensive for inmates too, with families paying up to $24.95 for a 15-minute phone call and commissary vendors that bring in $1.6 billion a year. Critics say privatizing prisons has given these corporations and their unions an incentive to lobby against reducing prison populations, saying this industry is often the loudest voice for increased incarceration and longer prison terms.
In a recent executive order, President Biden has decided not to renew Justice Department contracts with private prisons, except for those facilities which detain undocumented immigrants. This action will end the use of private prisons when these contracts expire unless a future president rescinds Biden’s order, or until a law is passed making this change permanent.
Pending Legislation: H.R.994 – Justice is not for sale act 0f 2021
Sponsor: Rep. Raul Grijalva (AZ)
Status: House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security (Judiciary)
Chair: Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (TX)
- I oppose reforming current prison privatization policy and wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (CA).
- I support:
1.) Requiring federal, state and local governments to directly operate and perform core services at adult prisons and detention centers.
2.) Requiring financial service providers at prisons and detention centers to impose reasonable and proportional fees and charges for money transfer services.
3.) Capping prison phone call rates and connection charges, requiring telecommunications providers to offer collect and debit account call services, restricting commission payments and ancillary charges, and allowing more than one telecommunications provider.
4.) Eliminating the requirement for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to maintain at least 34,000 detention beds and establishing alternatives to detention programs and determine detention bed capacity based solely on detention needs.
5.) Requiring annual inspections and routine oversight of detention facilities.
6.) Prohibiting family detention, requiring alternatives to detention programs for detained family units, and prohibiting separating a family to detain a family member, except to detain an alien parent who is dangerous and inadmissible on terrorism grounds.
7.) Allowing lawsuits for a person aggrieved by a violation of this bill.
And wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (TX) and/or to an advocate group currently working with this issue.
- I support:
1.) Requiring federal, state and local governments to directly operate and perform core services at adult prisons and detention centers.
2.) Requiring financial service providers at prisons and detention centers to impose reasonable and proportional fees and charges for money transfer services.
3.) Capping prison phone call rates and connection charges, requiring telecommunications providers to offer collect and debit account call services, restricting commission payments and ancillary charges, and allowing more than one telecommunications provider.
4.) Eliminating the requirement for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to maintain at least 34,000 detention beds and establishing alternatives to detention programs and determine detention bed capacity based solely on detention needs.
5.) Requiring annual inspections and routine oversight of detention facilities.
6.) Prohibiting family detention, requiring alternatives to detention programs for detained family units, and prohibiting separating a family to detain a family member, except to detain an alien parent who is dangerous and inadmissible on terrorism grounds.
7.) Allowing lawsuits for a person aggrieved by a violation of this bill.
And wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (TX) and/or to an advocate group currently working with this issue.
There has been $0.00 pledged in support of this issue
Trustee Election - Opening Date
October 18, 2021
Trustee Election - Closing Date
October 25, 2021