Polling
Sea-launched nuclear cruise missiles


Our nuclear arsenal now consists of about 5,400 nuclear warheads. These include submarine and land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles as well as aircraft capable of carrying nuclear-armed air-launched cruise missiles and nuclear gravity bombs. In 2010, we abandoned plans to build the TLAM–N nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile after concluding this capability served a redundant purpose in the U.S. nuclear stockpile. However, in 2020, we initiated studies into building a low-yield nuclear sea-launched cruise missile after concluding that the weapon would provide a “non-strategic regional presence” and “an assured response capability”. Supporters claim we need an in-kind weapon able to respond to Russia’s use of a low-yield nuclear strike on Europe or elsewhere. Considering the size of our defense budget, others think this weapon system is unnecessary. Lawmakers feel that installing nuclear warheads on Virginia-class attack subs would sap resources from growing the Navy’s fleet and distract from the core mission of attack submarines in the Pacific and European theaters, where they are typically laden with ship-killing, conventional Tomahawk missiles. It is estimated that a sea-launched nuclear cruise missile will cost at least $9 billion.

Proposed Legislation: Reintroduction of H.R.1554 - Nuclear SLCM Ban Act of 2021
Prospective Sponsor: Rep. Joe Courtney (CT)












Issue Suggestions


Suggest an important issue not listed in this sub-category (). (Maximum 60 Characters)
Suggestion




Poll Opening Date
June 5, 2023
Poll Closing Date
June 11, 2023


Democracy Rules respects the privacy of your information.
See PRIVACY STATEMENT