Pledging
These are the original issues in this subcategory
- ELECTORAL COLLEGE
- FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
- ELECTION INTERFERENCE
The 1966 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) provides that any person has the right of access to federal agency records or information. FOIA covers not only executive branch-created records, but also records in the executive branch’s possession. This Act carries a presumption of disclosure. The burden is on the government, not the public, to substantiate why information may not be released. Upon written request, government agencies are required to disclose requested records unless those documents can be lawfully withheld from disclosure under one of nine specific exemptions in the FOIA. However, previous administrations have greatly expanded the use of these exemptions and denied information requests made under the Act while encouraging its agencies to resist FOIA requests.
Federal agencies now stretch FOIA exemptions to hide records that may paint the agency in a bad light or reveal its problems and embarrassing information. Administrations claim increased secrecy is needed to protect national security and privacy issues. They also fear incriminating FOIA information could be used in the discovery stage of a civil litigation. Critics say this policy change not only prevents transparency in government actions but also allows privately operated bridges, dams, ports or power and chemical plants to hide health and safety information simply by voluntarily submitting their data to the Department of Homeland Security.
Critics call FOIA’s Exemption 5 -meant to protect certain internal government deliberations- the “most abused exemption.” It is cited about 5,000 times each month. The 2016 FOIA Improvement Act includes provisions specifically seeking to constrain the overuse and abuse of Exemption 5, requiring agencies to apply a “foreseeable harm” standard when seeking to withhold records under this exemption. However, critics say administrations continue to deny many legitimate FOIA requests.
Proposed Legislation: Introducing legislation to limit federal agencies use of the Freedom of information Act’s Exemption 5
Prospective Sponsor: Rep. Zoe Lofgren (CA)
Tweet
Federal agencies now stretch FOIA exemptions to hide records that may paint the agency in a bad light or reveal its problems and embarrassing information. Administrations claim increased secrecy is needed to protect national security and privacy issues. They also fear incriminating FOIA information could be used in the discovery stage of a civil litigation. Critics say this policy change not only prevents transparency in government actions but also allows privately operated bridges, dams, ports or power and chemical plants to hide health and safety information simply by voluntarily submitting their data to the Department of Homeland Security.
Critics call FOIA’s Exemption 5 -meant to protect certain internal government deliberations- the “most abused exemption.” It is cited about 5,000 times each month. The 2016 FOIA Improvement Act includes provisions specifically seeking to constrain the overuse and abuse of Exemption 5, requiring agencies to apply a “foreseeable harm” standard when seeking to withhold records under this exemption. However, critics say administrations continue to deny many legitimate FOIA requests.
Proposed Legislation: Introducing legislation to limit federal agencies use of the Freedom of information Act’s Exemption 5
Prospective Sponsor: Rep. Zoe Lofgren (CA)
Tweet
- I oppose reforming current Freedom of Information Act policy and wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Speaker Mike Johnson (LA).
- I support limiting federal agencies use of the Freedom of information Act’s Exemption 5 by: 1.) Requiring agencies to sufficiently show that disclosure of the requested records would cause a specific harm. 2.) Reducing the amount of time records can be withheld under this exemption to 12 years, the same cap for shielding presidential records. 3.) Mandating a balancing test -if an agency’s redactions are challenged- to mirror how the deliberative process privilege is treated in the discovery context. 4.) Requiring agencies and reviewing courts to weigh an agency’s need to protect the quality of its decisions against the public’s interest in disclosure. And wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Rep. Zoe Lofgren (CA) and/or to an advocate group currently working with this issue.
- I support limiting federal agencies use of the Freedom of information Act’s Exemption 5 by:
1.) Requiring agencies to sufficiently show that disclosure of the requested records would cause a specific harm.
2.) Reducing the amount of time records can be withheld under this exemption to 12 years, the same cap for shielding presidential records.
3.) Mandating a balancing test -if an agency’s redactions are challenged- to mirror how the deliberative process privilege is treated in the discovery context.
4.) Requiring agencies and reviewing courts to weigh an agency’s need to protect the quality of its decisions against the public’s interest in disclosure.
And wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Rep. Zoe Lofgren (CA) and/or to an advocate group currently working with this issue.
You May Pledge Your Support For This Issue With A Monetary
Donation And By Writing A Letter To Your Representatives
Donation And By Writing A Letter To Your Representatives
Please login to pledge
Pledge Period - Opening Date
February 3, 2025
Pledge Period - Closing Date
February 9, 2025
Trustee Election - Begins
February 10, 2025