Pledging
These are the original issues in this subcategory
- HEALTHCARE CYBERSECURITY
- UNIVERSAL CORONAVIRUS VACCINE
- UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE
Ours is the only wealthy industrialized nation that does not provide healthcare for its citizens. With costs increasing much faster than inflation, many advocates say we should follow Canada’s lead. Our northern neighbor’s publicly-funded healthcare system annually spends about $7,000 per person for healthcare compared to the $11,000 per person we spend. The World Health Organization reports that Canadians are just as healthy as we are, if not more so. Each year, our nation spends nearly $4 trillion on healthcare costs, and these costs are the biggest single driver of our budget deficit.
The passage of Obamacare in 2010, was the first major change to our healthcare system since 1965. This law is credited with giving about 23 million people health insurance, reducing healthcare prices due to increased competition, and prohibiting the abuses allowed by previous HMO policies. However, some Americans object to Obamacare because it forces everyone to buy insurance from HMOs, claiming these firms are the main reason our healthcare system is so expensive and inefficient compared to other nations.
Many believe Obamacare is not the final solution to our nation’s healthcare crisis. They claim HMOs are still charging us too much, and that universal coverage and significant savings will only be achieved with a “single payer” or “public option” healthcare system. Canada has a single-payer system in which the government pays everyone’s healthcare costs. Studies show this option would still be cheaper than what our nation is currently spending on all healthcare services. A public option is a healthcare system operated by the government which would compete with HMOs and force them to be more efficient and affordable. An example of a public option would be to allow Medicare to provide free healthcare services for all Americans who wish to participate. Opponents claim the quality of care will suffer with a government-run healthcare system. However, surveys have shown those receiving Medicare and Veterans health benefits are very satisfied with these government-provided healthcare services.
Pending Legislation: H.R.3069 - Medicare for All Act
Sponsor: Rep. Pramila Jayapal (WA)
Status: Referred to the House Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, Education and Workforce, Rules, Oversight and Government Reform, Armed Services, and the Judiciary for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker
House Speaker: Speaker Mike Johnson (LA)
Tweet
The passage of Obamacare in 2010, was the first major change to our healthcare system since 1965. This law is credited with giving about 23 million people health insurance, reducing healthcare prices due to increased competition, and prohibiting the abuses allowed by previous HMO policies. However, some Americans object to Obamacare because it forces everyone to buy insurance from HMOs, claiming these firms are the main reason our healthcare system is so expensive and inefficient compared to other nations.
Many believe Obamacare is not the final solution to our nation’s healthcare crisis. They claim HMOs are still charging us too much, and that universal coverage and significant savings will only be achieved with a “single payer” or “public option” healthcare system. Canada has a single-payer system in which the government pays everyone’s healthcare costs. Studies show this option would still be cheaper than what our nation is currently spending on all healthcare services. A public option is a healthcare system operated by the government which would compete with HMOs and force them to be more efficient and affordable. An example of a public option would be to allow Medicare to provide free healthcare services for all Americans who wish to participate. Opponents claim the quality of care will suffer with a government-run healthcare system. However, surveys have shown those receiving Medicare and Veterans health benefits are very satisfied with these government-provided healthcare services.
Pending Legislation: H.R.3069 - Medicare for All Act
Sponsor: Rep. Pramila Jayapal (WA)
Status: Referred to the House Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, Education and Workforce, Rules, Oversight and Government Reform, Armed Services, and the Judiciary for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker
House Speaker: Speaker Mike Johnson (LA)
Tweet
- I oppose reforming current universal healthcare policy and wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Speaker Mike Johnson (LA) .
- I support covering all U.S. residents through an expanded and improved Medicare program by: 1.) Covering all U.S. residents through an expanded and improved Medicare program, covering all medically necessary services, including dental, vision, hearing, prescription drugs, mental healthcare, reproductive health, and long-term care. 2.) Eliminating cost-sharing for covered services, including deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments. 3.) Requiring private health insurers and employers to only offer coverage that is supplemental to the federal program, not duplicative of it. Health insurance exchanges would be terminated. 4.) Requiring the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to negotiate prices for prescription drugs. 5.) Fully implementing the program two years after the bill is enacted. A transition period would allow for the enrollment of those under 18, over 55, or currently on Medicare within the first year. And wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Speaker Mike Johnson (LA) and/or to an advocate group currently working with this issue.
- I support covering all U.S. residents through an expanded and improved Medicare program by:
1.) Covering all U.S. residents through an expanded and improved Medicare program, covering all medically necessary services, including dental, vision, hearing, prescription drugs, mental healthcare, reproductive health, and long-term care.
2.) Eliminating cost-sharing for covered services, including deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments.
3.) Requiring private health insurers and employers to only offer coverage that is supplemental to the federal program, not duplicative of it. Health insurance exchanges would be terminated.
4.) Requiring the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to negotiate prices for prescription drugs.
5.) Fully implementing the program two years after the bill is enacted. A transition period would allow for the enrollment of those under 18, over 55, or currently on Medicare within the first year.
And wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Speaker Mike Johnson (LA) and/or to an advocate group currently working with this issue.
You May Pledge Your Support For This Issue With A Monetary
Donation And By Writing A Letter To Your Representatives
Donation And By Writing A Letter To Your Representatives
Please login to pledge
Pledge Period - Opening Date
October 13, 2025
Pledge Period - Closing Date
October 19, 2025
Trustee Election - Begins
October 20, 2025